November 10, 2012

Thirty-Five U.S. Bases Surround Iran - Who’s Threatening Whom?

Iran, which has not invaded another country for hundreds of years, has no nuclear weapons and may legally produce reactor fuel and medical isotopes as a party to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. The U.S. and Israeli governments, which have repeatedly bombed and invaded and militarily occupied territories in all directions around Israel, have been ironically considering military strikes against Iran’s uranium processing facilities, all the while maintaining nuclear arsenals that include Israel’s 150 to 600 and the United States’ 5,000 deployed warheads.

U.S. Senators Ron Johnson, Herb Kohl, Amy Klobuchar, and Al Franken must speak out urgently against any U.S. military attack on Iran. Voices of reason are needed to rebut the irrational, ignorant, and dangerous threats coming from the likes of Senator Lindsay Graham, R-SC, who declared two weeks ago, “The time for talking is over.” Sen. Graham’s provocation is preposterous considering the U.S. has had no direct talks with Iran for decades. 

As Ambassador James Dobbins, a Director of RAND, has pointed out, “We spoke to Stalin’s Russia. We spoke to Mao’s China. In both cases, greater mutual exposure changed their system, not ours. It’s time to speak to Iran, unconditionally and comprehensively.” Even former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Thomas Pickering recently wrote, “Patient, committed diplomacy is the only way to realize the long-term and durable objectives of an Iran without nuclear weapons and a region without war.… It is a grave and uncertain time.”

Nothing could be more grave or uncertain than the consequences of a
U.S. bombardment of Iran.

But two things are known about any such bombing: civilians would be the victims, and since
Iran hasn’t attacked anyone, it would be another example, as if history needs one, of unprovoked, unlawful aggression. After invading Iraq in 2003, two UN secretary generals said the adventure was unlawful. U.S. invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan have caused the death and dismemberment of hundreds of thousands of innocent and often illiterate civilians. All aerial bombing of cities destroys civilians and civilian objects, and consequently violate the U.S. Air Force’s own law, which prohibits attacks when civilian deaths are inevitable.  The city of Tehran alone has 8.8 million inhabitants.

Security Hawks Warn Against Long War, Call for Negotiations

On Oct. 15, a group of national security experts including prominent Republicans such as former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage and ex-Senator Chuck Hagel issued a report under the name Iran Project. They predicted that it could take many years of
U.S. bombing to ensure that there is no regrouping and restart of an Iranian nuclear program, following a much-discussed but limited initial U.S. bombing of the facilities. The report warns that preventing a restart would require a “significantly expanded air and sea war over a prolonged period of time, likely several years.”

The experts note that a
U.S. attack would invite endless retaliation. Their report anticipates the possible closure the Strait of Hormuz for days or weeks, devastating the world’s oil racket — as if gas prices weren’t high enough already. Iran could also sponsor rogue attacks on U.S. facilities around the world using mercenaries and surrogates, conceivably setting off a regional war, they said.

Moreover, the report warns that an attack would strengthen, not weaken,
Iran’s leaders’ hold on their country. Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has noted that in addition to merely delaying Iran’s nuclear program, military strikes could be counter-productive. War, “as far as I’m concerned…will bring together a divided nation, it will make them [Iranians] absolutely committed to attaining nuclear weapons, and they will just go deeper and more covert,” Gates told the Wall Street Journal CEO Council.

The Iranians claim their nuclear program is for power reactors and medical isotopes. Unless and until
Iran proves otherwise and moves to attack another state, there is no lawful or justifiable reason for the U.S. to bomb, and then only under strict UN Security Council authority. Indeed, how threatening can Iran really be?  It is the U.S. that has built at least 35 military bases that surround Iran (see map), and the U.S that maintains a fleet of Naval warships in the Persian Gulf.

ABC News reported in July that Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, of
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Aerospace Force, told reporters the U.S. has 35 bases around Iran and all are “within the reach of our missiles” and could be hit “in the early minutes after an attack.”

After decades of bloody
U.S. quagmires in Afghanistan and Iraq, our U.S. senators should help cooler heads prevail by demanding that diplomacy be put to work rather than more mayhem and wider war.

> This article was written by John LaForge of Nukewatch, a nuclear watchdog and anti-war group in
Wisconsin.  This article is reprinted from the Reader Weekly newspaper.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Pink Eli Manning Women's Jersey
Sean Taylor Jersey
Darren McFadden Women's Jersey

Anonymous said...

Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
Is it very difficult to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I'm thinking
about setting up my own but I'm not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? Cheers

my web page :: Ways to get rid of pseudo gynecomastia

Anonymous said...

Your style is unique compared to other folks I've read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you've got the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark
this site.

my web blog; chestfatburner.com

Anonymous said...

What a material of un-ambiguity and preserveness of precious know-how on the topic of unpredicted feelings.


my website ... chestfatburner.com

Anonymous said...

What i do not realize is in fact how you're now not really a lot more well-preferred than you may be now. You're
so intelligent. You realize thus considerably when it comes to this topic, produced me in
my view believe it from so many numerous angles.
Its like women and men aren't interested unless it is something to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. Always deal with it up!

My web-site: Do natural treatment options work with moobs patients?

Anonymous said...

Thankfulness to my father who stated to me about this weblog, this website is
really amazing.

Here is my web blog ... chestfatburner.com

Anonymous said...

You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find
this matter to be actually something that I think I would never understand.

It seems too complicated and very broad for me.
I'm looking forward for your next post, I'll try to get the
hang of it!

Also visit my web site :: is It possible to Eliminate man boobs with liposuction ?

jonny brand said...

good blog. regards iran, yes you're right. situation with north korea is very much the same. the US encircle north korea conducting military exercises with the south and have the cheek to tell us north korea are the antagonists.
you should delete/block the spam comments, mr 'chest fat burner' is quite persistent.